Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Whiplash for Your Cash

We’ve seen this movie before:

The media knows that nothing captures eyeballs better than photos of distressed traders during periods of extreme market volatility, and the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average this week has certainly given shorter-term speculators whiplash:

  • Monday, August 12                           -391        (trade war anxiety)
  • Tuesday, August 13                          +373       (delayed tariffs)  
  • Wednesday, August 14                     -800        (yield curve inverts)
  • Thursday, August 15                        +100        (strong consumer spending at retailers)
  • Friday, August 16 (as of 10:57AM)   +296        (Treasury yields recover from multi-year lows)

The media also glorifies this uncertainty; sensible, veteran investors (dare we say most Towerpoint Wealth clients) see it for what it is – noise. The daily, weekly, monthly, and even yearly machinations of the stock market are inevitable, and the sooner that fact is internalized, the higher the probability of success in building and protecting net worth. Craziness like this happens REGULARLY, as evidenced by one of our favorite illustrations:

Level-headed investors should appreciate the above illustration, especially within the context of this one, reflecting the probability of earning positive returns in the stock market, as measured by the S&P 500:

When things get temporarily crazy, we find ourselves asking: WWWD? Translated – What Would Warren (Buffett) Do? His answer:

Big swings in the markets may not be enjoyable, but they are definitely a fact of life, and for those who have implemented a disciplined strategic investment plan, volatility should be expected and embraced, not feared.

Towerpoint Wealth at Oracle Park

Our President (and Philadelphia Phillies fan) Joseph Eschleman, Partner – Wealth Advisor, Jonathan LaTurner, and Director of Tax and Financial Planning, Steve Pitchford, were fortunate to be hosted by Laura McDowell of Charles Schwab in the Schwab suite at Oracle Park for the Phillies – Giants game this past Saturday.

Choosing to partner with Charles Schwab as our custodian was unquestionably one of the most important early decisions we made when launching Towerpoint Wealth as a fully independent registered investment advisory (RIA) firm. From executing transactions to holding and clearing client assets, as well as monthly account and annual tax reporting, product and client management, investment research, and technology, working with the right custodian is an essential responsibility we have in being a legal fiduciary to our clients.

It quickly became obvious to us that partnering with Charles Schwab, the biggest, most experienced, and longest-tenured RIA custodian, was the right move to make for our clients, and we sincerely could not be happier with our partnership with “Chuck” and Co.!

In addition to market volatility and Bay Area baseball, a number of trending and notable events have occurred over the past two weeks:

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

  • Our recently-published July, 2019 Monthly Market Lookback, Summer in the City
  • A snapshot of the new custom Towerpoint Wealth sustainable investment offering
  • A tongue-in-cheek and well-written article that suggests spending money to buy expensive coffee drinks won’t necessarily derail your retirement! 

As always, we encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you may have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place, we are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

– Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Summer in the City

“An Investment in Knowledge Pays the Best Interest” (Ben Franklin)

Hot town, summer in the city
Back of my neck getting dirty and gritty

Been down, isn’t it a pity
Doesn’t seem to be a shadow in the city

All around, people looking half dead
Walking on the sidewalk, hotter than a match head

But at night it’s a different world
Go on out and find a girl
Come-on come-on and dance all night
Despite the heat it’ll be alright

(From “Summer in the City”, by The Lovin’ Spoonful, 1966)

The “dog days” of summer are upon us, and the “out of office” email bounce backs have increased accordingly. But while many Northern Hemisphere workers may be taking their summer breaks, the global economy continues to grind along.

The trends that have been in place for many months continue relatively unabated:

1. The global economy is still growing, but is decidedly slowing down, especially in manufacturing;

2. Less than halfway through the S&P 500 earnings report season, earnings growthis slightly positive year-over-year, but at a much lower growth rate than recent comparable periods;

3. Perhaps more troubling, the “revenue beat rate” is lower than historical averages. Put differently, companies are matching or beating their earnings expectations, but via financial engineering (e.g. stock buybacks) rather than by way of organic top-line revenue growth;

4. Interest rates remain low and, in fact, have fallen due to slowing global economies and the absence of inflation. According to Deutsche Bank, roughly 25% of all publicly traded sovereign and corporate debt is currently trading at negative yields!

5. Adding fuel to that fire, both the Fed and the ECB are expected to announce further monetary easing over the next month or two, especially in Europe as Mario Draghi prepares, later this year, to hand over the ECB reins to the former. Head of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde. Lagarde is widely viewed as a fairly extreme “dove”, and so the ECB is expected to remain very accommodative into the foreseeable future;

6. Inflation remains a non-issue in all major economies, though there are slight signs of upward pressure in the US as wages rise slowly but steadily; and

7. All major central banks remain completely accommodative, with not a single one even contemplating tightening measures.

The primary risks to the global economy remain geo-political – the on-again / off-again trade negotiations between the US and its major trading partners (especially China), renewed aggressive activity by North Korea, increasing tension with and actual aggressive activity by Iran in the Middle East and, perhaps most importantly (at least in the short term), the uncertainty over “Brexit.”

Theresa May was unable to negotiate a successful conclusion to “Brexit”, and it cost her the Prime Minister’s office. She has been replaced by the iconic and flamboyant Boris Johnson, a former Mayor of London and Cabinet Member in Theresa May’s government. Johnson promises a successful conclusion to his respective negotiations with the European Union and his own parliament over the issue of “Brexit,” but the markets do not share the same confidence – UK interest rates and the pound are both falling, the economy is slipping, and Bank of England Head Mark Carney continues to support “easy money” policies to try and stem the tide.

In our opinion, the global markets have become entirely too dependent on central bank policy. Central bankers are neither omniscient nor all-powerful and, besides, they may be running short of policy bullets to shoot. We fear this may not end well.

The Current Economic Landscape

The global economy is still expanding, though slowly:

• Through the end of July, the current estimate of US Q1 GDP growth slid slightly again to 3.0%, still positive but a slight decline from the early initial estimate of 3.2%. The initial estimate for Q2 GDP growth came in at 2.0% (source: The Wall Street Journal);

• US growth estimates for all of 2019 are roughly 2.2%, with further declines in later years (source: The Wall Street Journal);

• Ongoing trade negotiations and additional fiscal and/or monetary stimulus could change the economic outlook for the US over the course of the year. There does appear to be some progress in the negotiations between the US and China, but the market reacts strongly to the on-again / off-again nature of the discussions. The consensus is that some sort of deal will be reached toward the end of this year, but the “devil is in the details.” Some estimates suggest that a protracted trade war could shave as much as 0.5% off of projected US growth, and it is having an even worse effect on Chinese growth;

• Although the rhetoric and partisanship in Washington, DC suggest that therewill be no formal fiscal stimulus ahead of the 2020 elections, the two sides recently verbally agreed to lift the debt ceiling and increase both domestic and military spending caps, which will have a similar stimulative economic effect (at the expense of exploding national debts and deficits);

• That said, the market is pricing in a locked-down assumption that there will be additional monetary stimulus in the form of Fed rate cuts. As we go to publication, the Fed is widely expected to cut rates by 25 basis points when it next meets at the end of the month. The early talk of a 50 bps cut has faded, but the possibility remains, and the market is still pricing in expectations of additional cuts later this year;

• We maintain our concern that the risk profile of the market is very asymmetrical right now – in the wrong direction. What we mean is that the market seems to have fully priced in a lot of positive assumptions about trade and interest rates. If something else happens (as is always a possibility), we fear the market may react quite negatively;

• Both the US manufacturing (51.7) and services (55.1) sectors remained in expansionary mode in June (any reading above 50 is considered expansionary), but both slipped significantly versus prior months, suggesting a slowing economy, (source: The Institute for Supply Management);

• The IHS Markit estimate for July suggests a decline in the PMI down to 50.0 – a 118- month low (source: IHS Markit);

• Inflation remains muted (US CPI was just 1.6% year-over-year in June), and remains below the target rate of 2% set by the Fed. In a world where there is more than $12 trillion in negative yielding sovereign bonds and $600 billion in negative yielding corporate bonds, there seems to be an insatiable demand for US Treasury paper, even at rates as low as they have been in several years (source TradingEconomics);

• The employment picture in the US remains robust, and wages ticked up 3.6% year- over-year in May. Automation and globalization remain firm dampeners on wage growth, despite the low levels of unemployment – 3.7% in June (sources: The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank and TradingEconomics);

• With the Q2 earnings season less than halfway through, the overall picture is positive but with signs of deceleration. Of the roughly 150 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported as we go to publication, the earnings growth rate has been roughly 2.8% year-over-year, on roughly a 3.4% higher revenues. Fully 79% of reported companies have beat their earnings expectations, but only 59.4% have beaten their revenue expectations, suggesting financial engineering (primarily stock buybacks) is alive and well; (source: Zachs Earnings Outlook,

• The primary threats to continued economic expansion are tenuous trade and tariff negotiations (specifically between the US and China), signs of renewed aggression by North Korea, ongoing political “re-adjustments” in Europe, especially in the UK, Germany, and Italy, and escalating geo-political tensions between Iran and the “West”;

• With low inflation, signs of a decelerating economy, and huge investor demand for US Treasuries, there is little upward pressure on interest rates;

• The yield curve remains very flat, and the long end remains “tamped down” by high demand for US Treasuries and a lack of inflation fears;

• As we approach the end of July, there is only ~22 basis points difference between the yield on the 2-year and 10-year Treasury – the yield curve was fairly stable over the course of the month, and the 10-year Treasury rate currently is trading just above the psychological boundary of 2.00% (source: YCharts);

• Although the yield curve has not inverted as measured by the 10-year / 2-yearspread (our preferred measure), it is slightly inverted if measured by the 10- year / 3-month spread. Some analysts believe this to be a harbinger of an impending recession. We continue to think this is a bit over-stated, at least through the remainder of this year (source: YCharts);

• The US dollar generally weakened against the yen over the past month, but has strengthened versus the euro, given the explicit dovish sentiments expressed by Mario Draghi at the European Central Bank (ECB), as well as the assumption that his successor, Christine Lagarde, will remain equally if not more dovish (source: YCharts);

• There is a school of thought that President Trump does not mind the see-saw nature of the US / China trade negotiations because he believes it keeps the pressure on the Fed to remain accommodative. He has been outspoken (inappropriately, in our view) in his desire for lower rates and a weaker dollar, which he believes will reduce our trade imbalances. This strikes us as slightly too cynical but, regardless of motivation, it is a fairly accurate representation of where things currently stand with the Fed;

• The Euro area reported a Q1 GDP growth rate of 1.2%, the same as the previous quarter and in line with expectations. While not in a recession, European economic growth has fallen fairly steadily since 3Q, 2017, and is expected to fall further as we head through 2019 – early estimates for the Q2 growth rate are below 1% (source: TradingEconomics);

• Manufacturing all across the Euro area continues to slip and remains in nonexpansionary territory – 46.4 in July, the steepest monthly decline since December 2012, and the lowest reading since April 2013 (source: IHS Markit and TradingEconomics);

• The Euro area Services index remains slightly expansionary (53.3 in July, down from 53.6 in June) (source: TradingEconomics);

• Euro area unemployment fell slightly in June to 7.5%, and remains at its lowest level since 2008 (source: TradingEconomics);

• Inflation is a non-issue in Europe (up 1.3% year-over-year in June, but remaining at its lowest level since April 2018), and the ECB has turned decidedly dovish again. Deflation represents the bigger risk at this point

• Japan’s GDP is back in positive territory (1.8% in Q4 2018 and 2.2% in Q 12019), but remains sluggish and sensitive to changes in exchange rates. A weakening dollar (should it continue) will hurt Japanese exports, a critical factor in its economic activity (source: TradingEconomics);

• China’s (official) GDP growth in Q2 2019 was 6.2% (annualized), the lowest reported growth rate since Q1 of 1992. Fairly massive fiscal and monetary stimulus has had some positive effect, but the Chinese economy has been hit much harder than the US economy during the on-again / off-again trade negotiations. The simple fact is that China needs the US more than the US needs China (though both sides lose in an extended or escalated trade war) (source: TradingEconomics);

• The Chinese manufacturing index slipped back into contractionary mode in June, coming in at 49.4 (source: TradingEconomics).

The Towerpoint Wealth Economic & Market Outlook:

• The global economy remains non-recessionary, though there is a decided deceleration of growth, and ongoing trade tensions are beginning to have a tangible negative effect;

• US economic growth, interest rates, inflation, and earnings all remain at least slightly expansionary. Wages and input prices are slowly increasing, but we do not see them as threats (yet) to continued expansion;

• Globally, inflation simply is not a problem, due to slow growth and relatively stable input prices. Oil prices rose steadily through mid-May, fell off sharply toward the end of that month, but generally have stabilized since then at around the $60-$65 per barrel range (for Brent Crude);

• Global central bank policies remain “synchronized” around an easing theme, and this should be beneficial for risk assets. The UK and the ECB in particular have ramped up their “easing” activities, ahead of what could be a messy “Brexit” and the continued slowdown of economic activity in Europe;

• Market volatility spiked in May as investors showed increased nervousness over trade tensions, Brexit, and the perception of slowing economic growth. Since then, however, volatility (as measured by the VIX) has drifted back down to repressed levels – trading below 15% for most of July. Investors so strongly believe that trade tensions will ease and central banks will remain accommodative that they have slipped back into complacency (source: The St. Louis Fed);

• The ongoing market rally since June has raised US valuations back to historically high levels – once again, nothing looks cheap to us. More worrisome is that the rally is being driven by multiple expansion. Earnings are positive but soggy, but investors are willing to pay more and more for every dollar of earnings. By definition, this dampens the potential for longer-term returns;

• For longer-term investors we still like EM valuations relative to US or EAFE (developed international) valuations. Should the dollar continue to weaken, that will be beneficial for non-US market returns for US investors. The aggressive easing activities in Europe may prove beneficial for European-based EAFE risk assets;

• The US yield curve remains incredibly flat (there currently is a ~22 bps difference between the 2-year and 10-year yields), as lower longer-term expected growth rates and investment flows combine with only modest inflation expectations to “tamp down” the long-end of the curve (source: YCharts);

• As of the end of July, the 10-year Treasury rate was trading just above 2.00% – its lowest level since Q3 of 2017 (source: Charts);

• The yield curve remains slightly inverted if measured by the spread between 3-month rates and 10-year rates. As of the end of July, there was a negative spread of roughly 2 basis points (source: YCharts);

• The public credit markets continue to look expensive to us, although investors seem to be fairly compensated for default risk, as corporate balance sheets generally are in pretty good shape;

• Both investment grade and high yield credit spreads widened over the course of May, especially high yield spreads, but those spreads drifted generally lower over the course of June, and at the end of July remain incredibly tight by historical standards (source: YCharts);

• We remain concerned about high yield liquidity and refinancing risk and the growing level of“covenant lite” bank loans. Additionally, more than 40% of non-financial investment grade debt is rated BBB – the lowest investment grade level. If and when we head into the next recession, there could be a liquidity crisis if more than a modest amount of this debt falls into non-investment grade territory (source: FocusEconomics);

• As we go to publication, the yield on 10-year Greek sovereign debt is trading below that of the yield on 10-year US Treasuries. This is due to a slowing European economy and high anticipation of additional monetary easing by the ECB. When considered from a relative credit risk perspective, however, this is absurd, and is simply another illustration of how excessive central bank intervention can distort the global capital markets;

• For investors who can access the private markets and handle some degree of illiquidity, we still believe there are better opportunities in the private versus public markets, though investors face increasingly compressed premiums versus historical levels, driven by huge investment flows over the past 24-30 months. At this point in time, we have higher conviction in the private equity market versus the private credit market;

• Hedge funds generally are performing as expected and, given valuation levels for the traditional public equity and credit markets, there is growing investor interest in considering lower-correlated investment strategies. Despite low interest rates and low volatility, many hedge funds seem to have “found their footing” and are generating returns more in line with historical expectations;

• Liquid alternatives (alternative investment strategies that trade in mutual fund form) continue to struggle, though they, like their hedge fund cousins, are showing signs of improvement;

• Real assets and commodities generally have been stable to slightly rising over the past few months, helping to keep input price inflation well in check;

• When we consider the fundamental drivers of market performance – economic growth, earnings, interest rates, inflation, and central bank policy – we remain generally constructive, but we have entered a new phase of the market cycle, and we expect increased volatility and periodic bouts of investor panic as we move through the year, especially once the “dog days” of summer are over;

• With that in mind, we believe a heightened focus on quality, liquidity, and diversification is an appropriate course of action.

People are on vacation and, here in the US, Congress is about to head off for a 5-6 week recess. So we expect a generally quiet period as we head into and through the heart of the summer. But while the risks may lie dormant due to general inattention, they certainly have not gone away. Enjoy the more relaxed market environment while you can – we suspect things will get “interesting” again once the summer months have passed.

Warm Regards,
Joseph F. Eschleman, CIMA® President Towerpoint Wealth, LLC

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Are You Old Enough To Remember When…?

An entertaining hashtag on Twitter, #ImOldEnoughToRememberWhen, has been trending recently. Are you old enough to remember when this was the price of food at McDonalds?

We also couldn’t resist including this one:

Yesterday, the U.S. Federal Reserve, led by Chair Jerome Powell, cut short-term interest rates by 1/4 percent, the first interest rate cut by the Fed since 2008. This came as a surprise to virtually no one, as Powell had been strongly signaling for months that the Fed was planning on doing so.

What we find interesting is not the rate cut itself, but the motivation behind it and the potential consequences of the Fed arguably deviating from its legal mandate. With the passage of the Federal Reserve Reform Act of 1977, the Fed was formally assigned a specific directive, commonly known as the “dual mandate,” to pursue the following goals:

If you would like a quick laugh, click HERE to watch a short video of Steve getting embarrassed while being serenaded by his TPW family for his birthday!

In addition to rate cuts and pizza parties, a number of trending and notable events have occurred over the past two weeks:

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

  • An on-site visit to Towerpoint Wealth by First Trust bond portfolio manager Nick Novosad
  • A well-assembled article discussing planning strategies that can help to reducethe tax consequences of IRA and 401(k) accounts
  • An excellent non-partisan analysis of the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election cycle

As always, we encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you may have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place, we are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.


Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Opportunity is Knocking – Are You Listening?

Capital gains tax – nobody likes paying it.

However, with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, there is now a very tangible opportunity to deferreduce, and to some degree, eliminate having to pay federal capital gains tax on the sale of an asset that has grown in value. How? By investing in an investment vehicle known as a Qualified Opportunity Zone Fund.

Twelve percent (8,762, to be exact) of U.S. census tracts have been designated as Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZs) by the Department of the Treasury, and there are a plethora of QOZ funds that have been created to invest in them. 

Not surprisingly, there are a host of economic considerations and risks that investors need to be acutely aware of when evaluating an investment in a QOZ fund. However, if you are holding a stock, bond, mutual fund, or piece of real estate primarily because you are looking to avoid paying the capital gains taxes associated with selling it, we believe exploring QOZs, and the funds that invest in them, would be a worthwhile investment of time for you.

At Towerpoint Wealth, we recognize the potential financial benefits, and understand the recent attention and momentum that QOZs have garnered over the past year, and have helped a number of qualified clients and prospective clients (in conjunction with their tax advisors) more closely evaluate the merits of Qualified Opportunity Zone investing. To further highlight and share our expertise in this burgeoning area, we just last week published a new white paper (Opportunity Knocks) that discusses this tremendous opportunity. We encourage you to call or email us to discuss in greater detail how QOZ investing may complement your current financial and investment plan and strategy.

TPW Hosts Ice Cream Social at Shriner’s Hospital

The Towerpoint Wealth family had a great time last week setting up an ice cream social for patients at the local Shriners Hospital for Children – Northern California. It was great putting a smile on the kids’ faces with some fresh vanilla, chocolate, and strawberry ice cream from the best ice cream joint in Sacramento, Gunther’s Ice Cream!

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

As always, we encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you may have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place, we are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Take the Bait or Be Patient and Wait?

When it comes to deciding at what age you elect to initiate your Social Security benefit, waiting can make all the difference.

We have found that many investors are tempted to take Social Security early, before their full retirement age (FRA), even as early as age 62. However, giving in to this temptation can oftentimes be a costly one.

For every year you delay Social Security benefits after your FRA, you receive a guaranteed 8% annual increase in your benefit amount!

Aside from a complicated government benefit program and a cholesterol-laced breakfast party, a number of trending and notable events have occurred over the past two weeks:

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

We encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place. We are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

– Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

All Along the Watchtower

“An Investment in Knowledge Pays the Best Interest” (Ben Franklin)

All Along the Watchtower

There must be some way out of here
Said the joker to the thief
There’s too much confusion
I can’t get no relief


Businessmen, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None of them along the line
Know what any of it is worth


No reason to get excited
The thief he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke

But you and I, we’ve been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us not talk falsely now
The hour is getting late

All along the watchtower
Princes kept the view
While all the women came and went
Barefoot servants, too

(From “All Along the Watchtower”, by Bob Dylan, made famous by Jimi Hendrix, 1968)

As has been the case so many times over the past ten years, May’s sharp stock market sell-off was followed by an equally sharp “V-Shaped” recovery through most of June, and the markets are now once again at or near all-time highs.

As has also frequently been the case, not much changed in the underlying economy – the market movements were driven almost exclusively by headlines, tweets, and sentiment. Specifically, the market has now priced in an almost 100% certainty that the Fed will cut rates in July, and perhaps once or twice more over the remainder of 2019.

That was followed by some President Trump tweets indicating that he would meet with Chinese Premier Xi Jinping at the late June “G-20” talks in Japan which, in turn, gave the market renewed hope that ongoing trade negotiations might reach a successful conclusion.

And off to the races we went yet again…

It is true that the May sell-off was over-done, and the same probably can be said about the June bounce-back. The simple fact is that what are supposed to be the fundamental drivers of market performance simply have not changed that much over the past two months:

  1. The global economy remains positive but decelerating, especially outside the US, and especially in global manufacturing;
  2. Global revenues and earnings remain positive, though also decidedly decelerating;
  3. Inflation is nowhere to be found, and it is hard to imagine what might spark it upward, other than a protracted Middle East crisis between the US and Iran (which, by the way, is not off the table, though the market does not seem to be pricing in any huge concern that it may turn into an actual “hot” war);
  4. Global central banks remain uniformly accommodative – there is not a single major central bank that is even considering tightening right now;
  5. Global interest rates remain pegged to the floor, with no signs of increasing. There currently is in excess of $12 trillion in negative yielding sovereign bonds – investors are paying governments to hold their money! The 10-year US Treasury yield currently is fluctuating just above or below 2.00%, with no signs of rising quickly anytime soon;
  6. It is true that the 10-year minus 3-month Treasury curve has “inverted” for the past month or so, leading some to make the call that a recession is on the way;
  7. That said, the 10-year minus 2-year curve (the spread we prefer to follow) remains slightly upward sloping and, even if the curve is calling out an impending recession, historically we’ve had 9-18 months to prepare

Please understand – we will have the next recession at some point, but it does not seem very likely for a while – probably at least not through 2019, barring a turn for the worst in US/China trade talks, escalating tensions in the Middle East with Iran, or both.

All major governments seem dedicated to engaging in whatever fiscal and/or monetary stimulus is necessary to keep the economic growth engine running, albeit with diminishing marginal returns and at the expense of exploding national debts and deficits.

We suspect our children and grandchildren will not think very highly of us when that piper demands to be paid.

With that as a backdrop, looking out over the current economic and investment landscapes, here is what we see.

The Current Economic & Market Landscape

The global economy is still expanding, though slowly:

Through the end of June, the current estimate of US Q1 GDP growth remains at 3.1%, still positive but a slight decline from the early initial estimate of 3.2%. A fair amount of this expansion was due to inventory growth, which suggests lower growth in the future as the inventories are sold off (source: Bureau of Economic Analysis);

• US Growth is expected to slow to roughly 1.6% – 1.9% over the next 2-3 quarters, and estimates for all of 2019 have fallen to the 1.6% – 2.0% range
(source: The Wall Street Journal);

• Ongoing trade negotiations and additional fiscal and/or monetary stimulus could change the economic outlook for the US over the course of the year. Specifically, the markets reacted positively to the news that President Trump and Chinese Premier Xi will “talk” at the G-20 summit in Japan at the end of June. The hope is that progress toward a positive trade outcome is back on the table. Some estimates suggest that a protracted trade war could shave as much as 0.5% off of projected US growth, and it is having an even worse effect on Chinese growth;


• President Trump remains unpredictable in his trade announcements, but there does seem to be progress in the negotiations between the US and its primary trading partners (specifically, China, Canada, Mexico, and Europe). The market certainly is pricing in assumptions about deals being agreed to over the course of 2019;

• Given the rhetoric and partisanship in Washington, DC, we do not anticipate any agreement for additional fiscal stimulus prior to the 2020 elections;

• That said, the market is pricing in a locked-down assumption that there will be additional monetary stimulus in the form of Fed rate cuts. As we reach the end of June, the market (as measured by Fed Funds Futures) is pricing in an almost 100% certainty that the Fed will cut rates by at least 25 basis points when it next meets in July (after announcing no rate cut at its June meeting), and the assumption is that there will be at least one and possibly two rate cuts by the end of the year;


• The market has reacted very positively to this assumption of a rate cut, but we have a bit of difficulty understanding what the excitement is about. Interest rates already are as low as they have been in years – what difference will a 25 (or even 50) bp cut in rates make? It seems the market simply is rewarding the Fed for not raising rates, versus pricing in the actual market impact of a cut;


• Frankly, we see the risk profile of the market as being very asymmetrical right now – in the wrong direction. What we mean is that the market seems to have fully priced in a lot of positive assumptions about trade and interest rates. If something else happens (as is always a possibility), we fear the market may react quite negatively;


• Both the US manufacturing (52.1) and services (56.9) sectors remained in expansionary mode in May (any reading above 50 is considered expansionary). The PMI (manufacturing) index continued its fairly steady month-over-month decline, but the NMI (services) index reversed course and ticked up for the month
(source: The Institute for Supply Management);

• The IHS Markit estimates for June suggest declines in the PMI (down to 50.1) and the NMI (down to 50.9)
(source: IHS Markit);

• As the summer continues, increased attention will be paid to ongoing federal budget negotiations, including a required raising of the debt ceiling sometime in September or October. The federal debt and deficit are exploding and neither political party is the least bit interested in addressing the issue. There is no spending discipline in Washington, DC right now;


• Inflation remains muted (US CPI was just 1.8% year-over-year in May), and remains below the target rate of 2% set by the Fed. In a world where there is more than $12 trillion in negative yielding sovereign bonds, there seems to be an insatiable demand for US Treasury paper, even at rates as low as they have been in several years
(source TradingEconomics);

• The employment picture in the US remains robust, though wages ticked down in May (up 3.11%year-over-year, down slightly from their recent high of 3.4% in February). Automation and globalization remain firm dampeners on wage growth, despite the low levels of unemployment –3.6% in May (source: The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank);

• With the Q2 earnings season set to begin in another week or two, current expectations are for decided deceleration. S&P 500 earnings for Q2 are expected to fall 3.1% year-over-year, on an estimated 4.3% increase in revenues. For the full year of 2019, current estimates are for earnings to increase 1.1% on revenue increases of 2.5% — still positive growth but a dramatic decrease in comparison to 2018;
(source: Zachs Earnings Outlook, June 19, 2019);

• The primary threats to continued economic expansion remain tenuous trade and tariff negotiations, ongoing political “re-adjustments” in Europe, especially in the UK, and escalating geo-political tensions between the US and Iran;


• With low inflation, signs of a decelerating economy, and huge investor demand for US Treasuries, there is little upward pressure on interest rates;


• The yield curve remains very flat, and the long end remains “tamped down” by high demand for US Treasuries and a lack of inflation fears;


• As we approach the end of June, there is only ~30 basis points difference between the yield on the 2-year and 10-year Treasury – the yield curve fell considerably over the course of the month, and the 10-year Treasury rate currently is fluctuating just above or below the psychological boundary of 2.00%
(source: YCharts);

• Although the yield curve has not inverted as measured by the 10-year / 2-year spread (our preferred measure), it has inverted (and remained so for more than a month) if measured by the
10- year / 3-month spread. Some analysts believe this to be a harbinger of an impending recession. We continue to think this is a bit over-stated and are not overly concerned that (a) the curve will invert for any extended period of time or (b) should it invert it does not necessarily mean we are headed into a recession any time soon
(i.e., any time this year);

• Given the strongly held assumption that the Fed will cut rates in July, the US dollar weakened against both the euro and the yen over the past month, despite dovish sentiments expressed by Mario Draghi at the European Central Bank (ECB);

• President Trump has been explicit that he desires a weaker dollar and lower interest rates, and has threatened Fed Chairman Jerome Powell with demotion or firing if he doesn’t deliver. We continue to believe this is inappropriate behavior, and that it is important for the Fed to remain an independent agency acting on behalf of smoothly functioning capital markets, not the political desires of any given President. No central bank is omniscient, and they have made and will continue to make mistakes, but they should remain independent;

• The Euro area reported a Q1 GDP growth rate of 1.2%, the same as the previous quarter and in line with expectations. While not in a recession, European economic growth has fallen fairly steadily since the 3rd quarter of 2017
(source: TradingEconomics);

• Manufacturing all across the Euro area continues to slip and remains in non-expansionary territory – 47.8 in June, the fifth straight monthly decline and the lowest reading since April 2013
(source: IHS Markit and TradingEconomics);

• On the other hand, the Euro area Services index remains expansionary (53.4 in June, up from 52.5 in May) (source: TradingEconomics);
• Euro area unemployment fell slightly in May to 7.6%, and remains at its lowest level since 2008
(source: TradingEconomics);

• Inflation is a non-issue in Europe (1.2% year-over-year in May, down from 1.7% in April, and at its lowest level since April 2018), and the ECB has turned decidedly dovish again. Deflation represents the bigger risk at this point
(source: TradingEconomics);

• Japan’s GDP is back in positive territory (1.8% in Q4 2018 and 2.2% in Q1 2019), but remains sluggish and sensitive to changes in exchange rates. A weakening dollar (should it continue) will hurt Japanese exports, a critical factor in its economic activity
(source: TradingEconomics);

• China’s (official) GDP growth in Q1 2019 was 6.4% (annualized), the same as Q4 2018, and represented the lowest reported growth rate since the Financial Crisis in 2008. Fairly massive fiscal and monetary stimulus has had some positive effect, but the Chinese economy has been hit much harder than the US economy during the on-again / off-again trade negotiations. The simple fact is that China needs the US more than the US needs China (though both sides lose in an extended or escalated trade war)
(source: TradingEconomics);

• The Chinese manufacturing index remained barely expansionary in May, at 50.2 (source: TradingEconomics).


The Towerpoint Wealth Economic & Market Outlook:

• The global economy remains non-recessionary, though there is a decided deceleration of growth, and ongoing trade tensions are beginning to have a tangible negative effect;

• US economic growth, interest rates, inflation, and earnings all remain at least slightly expansionary. Wages and input prices are slowly increasing, but we do not see them as threats (yet) to continued expansion;


• Globally, inflation simply is not a problem, due to slow growth and relatively stable input prices. Oil prices rose steadily through mid-May, fell during the market panic toward the end of the month, but generally have stabilized since then;


• Global central bank policies remain “synchronized” around an easing theme, and this should be beneficial for risk assets;


• Market volatility spiked in May as investors showed increased nervousness over trade tensions, Brexit, and the perception of slowing economic growth. The bounce-back through most of June once again brought volatility back down to repressed levels – investors so strongly believe that trade tensions will ease and central banks will remain accommodative that they have slipped back into complacency;


• The June rally raised US valuations back to historically high levels – once again, nothing looks cheap to us;


• For longer-term investors we still like EM valuations relative to US or EAFE (developed international) valuations. Should the dollar continue to weaken, that will be beneficial for non-US market returns for US investors;


• The US yield curve remains incredibly flat (there currently is a ~30 bps difference between the 2-year and 10-year yields), as lower longer-term expected growth rates and investment flows combine with only modest inflation expectations to “tamp down” the long-end of the curve
(source: YCharts);

• As of the end of June, the 10-year Treasury rate was trading just above or below 2.00% – its lowest level since Q3 of 2017
(source: YCharts);

• The yield curve has actually inverted if measured by the spread between 3-month rates and 10-year rates. As of the end of June, there was a negative spread of roughly 11 basis points, and that spread has been negative for most of the past month – its longest “inversion” in years
(source: YCharts);

• The public credit markets continue to look expensive to us, although investors seem to be fairly compensated for default risk, as corporate balance sheets generally are in pretty good shape;

• Both investment grade and high yield credit spreads widened over the course of May, especially high yield spreads, but those spreads drifted generally lower over the course of June, and remain incredibly tight by historical standards
(source: YCharts);

• We remain concerned about high yield liquidity and refinancing risk and the growing level of “covenant lite” bank loans. Additionally, more than 40% of non-financial investment grade debt is rated BBB – the lowest investment grade level. If and when we head into the next recession, there could be a liquidity crisis if more than a modest amount of this debt falls into non-investment grade territory
(source: FocusEconomics);

• For investors who can access the private markets and handle some degree of illiquidity, we still believe there are better opportunities in the private versus public markets, though investors face increasingly compressed premiums versus historical levels, driven by huge investment flows over the past 24-30 months;


• Hedge funds generally are performing as expected, and given valuation levels for the traditional public equity and credit markets, there is growing investor interest in considering lower-correlated investment strategies;


• Liquid alternatives (alternative investment strategies that trade in mutual fund form) continue to struggle, though they “did their job” in May and June with respect to mitigating market volatility and downside market movement;


• Real assets generally have been stable to slightly rising. Oil prices may be affected by ongoing geo-political tensions between the US and Iran, but that is not yet in evidence as we reach the end of June;


• When we consider the fundamental drivers of market performance – economic growth, earnings, interest rates, inflation, and central bank policy – we remain generally constructive, but we have entered a new phase of the market cycle, and we expect increased volatility and periodic bouts of investor panic as we move through the year, especially once the “summer doldrums” are over;


• With that in mind, we believe a heightened focus on quality, liquidity, and diversification is an appropriate course of action.

As we review the general state of the global economy and investment markets, the word that keeps running through our mind is “asymmetrical”. We believe that the underlying fundamentals remain generally positive, but the market increasingly is “priced for perfection” and subject to downside shocks if what’s being priced in turns out differently than expected.

As Sergeant Phil Esterhaus used to say on the iconic 1980s TV cop show Hill Street Blues, “Let’s be careful out there”…

Joseph F. Eschleman, CIMA® President
Towerpoint Wealth, LLC

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

“The stock market is too high…”

“The stock market is too high…” – a fairly typical response offered up by shorter-term traders and/or novice investors.

The S&P 500 hit a historic peak on Friday, touching an intraday record high of 2,964.15 subsequent to the U.S. Federal Reserve seemingly telegraphing an “easy-money” posture last week, with many experts believing that an interest rate cut may be forthcoming.

Independent of what the Fed may or may not do for the rest of 2019, the phrase “It’s too high” has been one that has been uttered for decades. Noting that the Dow Jones Industrial Average (or simply “The Dow”) is oftentimes the more favored or recognized index by retail investorsinstitutional investors perceive the S&P 500 as more representative of the U.S. stock market because it comprises more stocks across all sectors – 500 companies, versus only 30 for the Dow.

The S&P 500 opened on January 1, 1950 at 16.88. By January 1, 1955, it had more than doubled to 35.60. Less than ten years later, it more than doubled again, to 76.45 on January 1, 1964. And so on, and so on, and so on:

– January 1, 1973: 118.40
– January 1, 1984: 166.40
– January 1, 1988: 250.50
– January 1, 1992: 416.08
– January 1, 1998: 963.36
– January 1, 2002: 1,140.21
– January 1, 2007: 1,424.16
– January 1, 2015: 2,028.18
– January 1, 2018: 2,789.80 

Click HERE for source.

Notice a trend? While it is important, if not essential, to note that there have been extended periods of time when the stock market (as measured by the S&P 500) has been in decline, what is clear is that if you have a ten year window, the probability of generating positive returns is extremely high:

In summary, we feel very comfortable that as long as you have this discipline to follow a well-assembled and objective plan and strategy that ensures you: Don’t Panic during pullbacks, speed-bumps, and recessions (which can last for years), that the probability is quite high you will enjoy the continued growth of this:

Billigmeier Sits for CFA® Level 2 Exam

Locally, our Director of Research and Analytics, Nathan Billigmeier, sat for his Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA®) Level 2 exam last Saturday at the Sacramento Convention Center in downtown Sacramento. With pass rates below 50% for each Level, the CFA series of tests is one of the most difficult sets of financial certifications, with a minimum of 300 hours (!) of study recommended for each exam.

A globally-recognized professional designation, and arguably the highest distinction in the investment management profession, the CFA® gives a strong understanding of advanced investment analysis and real-world portfolio management skills. Measuring and certifying the competence and integrity of financial analysts, candidates are required to pass three levels of exams covering areas such as accounting, economics, ethics, money management, and security analysis.

From 1963 to 2018, 1,696,451 candidates have sat for the Level 1 exam, with only 246,654 ultimately going on to pass the Level 3 exam. That represents a weighted average completion rate of only 14.5%.

We are very proud of all of the energy and time Nate has already invested in his CFA® curriculum, and are confident it is not “if” but “when” he ultimately earns the certification. In the meantime, after his grueling Level 2 exam, he definitely earned a few days earlier this week to decompress, during which time he enjoyed a round of golf on Tuesday (while representing TPW) at Old Greenwood in Truckee.

Putting aside stock market gyrations and cramming for exams, a number of trending and notable events have occurred over the past two weeks:

NBA Finals 2019: Amidst key injuries, the Golden State Warriors lose to the Toronto Raptors in six games
Trump, Biden trade barbs amid dueling Iowa campaign visits
Fashion icon Gloria Vanderbilt, dead at 95
Happy Father’s Day 2019
The U.S. women’s soccer team ends group stages of 2019 World Cup with a third shutout victory
– Juneteenth celebrated on June 19, commemorating the end of slavery in the United States
Escalating hostilities between President Trump and Iran heighten war worries
Phenom Zion Williamson selected first at the 2019 NBA draft
Solstice 2019 – summer officially arrives today in the Northern Hemisphere

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

– Our most recent May-June 2019 Monthly Market Lookback publication, “Danger Zone
– Additional details about the CFA® program and curriculum
– Information on the GasBuddy app, which helps you find where the nearest gas stations are, and identify which are the cheapest today

We encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place. We are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

– Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

Danger Zone

“An Investment in Knowledge Pays the Best Interest” (Ben Franklin)

Revvin’ up your engine
Listen to her howlin’ roar
Metal under tension
Beggin’ you to touch and go

Highway to the danger zone
Ride into the danger zone

Headin’ into twilight
Spreadin’ out her wings tonight
She got you jumpin’ off the track
And shovin’ into overdrive

Highway to the danger zone I’ll take you
Ridin’ into the danger zone…

Out along the edges Always
where I burn to be The further on
the edge The hotter the intensity

Highway to the danger zone
Gonna take you
Right into the danger zone

(From “Danger Zone”, performed by Kenny Loggins for the film “Top Gun”, 1986)

“Sell in May and go away” is, perhaps, our least favorite market cliché. It strikes us as simplistic and slightly juvenile. Except for the fact that it often proves true – the summer months do tend to exhibit less trading volume and, therefore (perhaps counterintuitively), the markets often react more violently to transitory news.

Many investors probably wish they had sold this May and gone away – it was a volatile and chaotic month, with all major equity markets posting negative performances. The primary drivers seem to be (a) a perception that both global economic growth and earnings are slowing down, and (b) the ongoing (and escalating) trade tensions between the US and China (and, now, potentially between the US and both Mexico and the European Union).

The collapse of Theresa May’s Conservative government in the UK over the issue of “Brexit” did not help, either. While we continue to believe that things will work out over time with respect to both trade negotiations and Brexit, we also believe both issues may get much worse before they get better, and many investors seem to agree with us.

In addition to a dramatic increase in market noise (i.e., trade tensions and Brexit), the market signals we encourage investors to focus on – earnings, economic growth, inflation, interest rates, and global central bank policy – are somewhat mixed:

  1. There seems to be little disagreement that both economic growth and earnings are decelerating, though actual recession still seems to remain fairly far down the path;
  2. Inflation has shown some signs of accelerating as both input prices and wages slowly increase, but for now it remains well under control, and the bigger risk in Europe is actually deflation;
  3. Interest rates should remain low into the foreseeable future; and
  4. All major global central banks remain accommodative. In fact, the markets are actually starting to price in an assumption of a Fed rate cut (or perhaps even two) at some point in 2019.

The shape of the US yield curve, which is incredibly flat and which at times over the past few months has temporarily inverted, seems to be signaling an impending recession, and perhaps that is true, but we do not think it will happen in 2019.

Because we do believe there will be an eventual end to the ongoing trade negotiations between the US and its trading partners (and a collective market “sigh of relief” when it occurs), and because we do believe the Brexit issue will also work itself out, we remain generally constructive on both the global economy and the overall investment markets. But we also are increasingly cautious.

It is true that things tend to slow down as we head into and through the summer months, but it is also true that for the past several years we’ve experienced a sharp uptick in volatility as we head into the fall.

We fully expect that to be the case again this year, and investors should manage their expectations and their portfolios accordingly.

With that as a backdrop, looking out over the current economic and investment landscapes, here is what we see.

The Current Economic & Market Landscape

The global economy is still expanding, though slowly:

  • The current estimate of Q1 GDP growth in the US is 3.1%, still very positive but a slight decline from the initial estimate of 3.2%. A fair amount of this expansion was due to inventory growth, which suggests lower growth in the future as the inventories are sold off (source: Bureau of Economic Analysis);
  • We suspect future estimates of Q1 GDP will show lower but still positive growth. Growth is expected to slow to roughly 2% over the next 2-3 quarters, and estimates for all of 2019 remain in the 2.0% – 2.5% range (source: The Wall Street Journal);
  • Ongoing trade negotiations and additional fiscal and/or monetary stimulus could change the economic outlook for the US over the course of the year. Specifically, US/China trade talks have stalled, and the markets are beginning to price in escalating tensions, tariffs, and mutual retaliation. Some estimates suggest that a protracted trade war could shave as much as 0.5% off of projected US growth;
  • Additionally, at the end of May, President Trump unexpectedly announced an escalating series of tariffs on Mexico if it doesn’t do more to stop Central American immigrants from crossing the country to get to the United States. This throws the impending ratification of the USMCA trade treaty into question (USMCA is the replacement to NAFTA);
  • AND Trump is also threatening potentially higher tariffs on European imports. As we go to publication it is too early to tell what the impact of these newly announced potential tariffs may do to the global economy, but it won’t be positive, and the markets are reacting accordingly (on the news the equity markets dropped sharply and the US 10-year Treasury rate fell below 2.20%);
  • Given the rhetoric and partisanship in Washington, DC, we do not anticipate any agreement for additional fiscal stimulus prior to the 2020 elections;
  • That said, there may be additional monetary stimulus in the form of Fed rate cuts. The markets previously had priced in no movement from the Fed in either direction for the remainder of 2019, but sentiment has shifted in the wake of recent volatility and market movement, and there now seems to be a belief that the Fed will cut rates (maybe even twice) prior to year-end;
  • Both the US manufacturing (52.8) and services (55.5) sectors remained in expansionary mode in April (any reading above 50 is considered expansionary), but both have showed signs of deceleration for the past several months. The IHS Markit estimates for May for these indicators are 50.6 and 53.2 for PMI and NMI, respectively (source: Institute for Supply Management and IHS Markit);
  • The federal debt and deficit are exploding and neither political party is the least bit interested in addressing the issue. There is no spending discipline in Washington, DC right now;
  • Inflation remains muted (US CPI was 2% year-over-year in April) but is showing signs of increasing slowly as both wages and oil prices tick up. There seems to be an insatiable demand for US Treasury paper, and May saw a distinct “flight to quality” when the equity market entered its downturn. All of these factors are keeping longer- term interest rates very low;
  • The employment picture in the US remains robust, and wage increases are finally showing up (up 3.27% year-over-year in Q1) – not commensurate with the low levels of unemployment and not enough to spark inflation (yet), but workers definitely are making more money, across almost all industry sectors (source: The St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank);
  • With the Q1 earnings season in the US largely behind us, both the revenue (56.4%) and earnings (62.5%) “beat rates” are positive and generally in line with historical averages, though both showed declines from previous quarters (source: Bespoke Investment Group);
  • The primary threats to continued economic expansion remain escalating trade and tariff tensions and ongoing political “re-adjustments” in Europe (Brexit, Italy, France, and Germany);
  • With low inflation, signs of a decelerating economy, and huge investor demand or US Treasuries, there is little upward pressure on interest rates;
  • The yield curve remains very flat, and the long end remains “tamped down” by high demand for US Treasuries and a lack of inflation fears;
  • Through the end of May, there is only ~14 basis points difference between the yield on the 2- year and 10-year Treasury – the yield curve both flattened and fell over the course of the month as market fears increased;
  • There seems to be growing investor sentiment that the flatness of the curve may evolve into an inversion (when short-term rates are higher than longer-term rates) and signal an impending recession. We think this is a bit over-stated and are not overly concerned that (a) the curve will invert for any extended period of time or (b) should it invert it does not necessarily mean we are headed into a recession any time soon (i.e., any time this year);
  • Though showing some signs of stabilizing, the US dollar generally has strengthened over the course of the year. We attribute this to the “cleanest dirty shirt” syndrome – despite the dovish tone of the Fed, the US economy is outpacing the rest of the world and investment flows are responding accordingly;
  • The Euro area reported a Q1 GDP of 1.2%, the same as the previous quarter and in line with expectations. While not in a recession, European economic growth has fallen fairly steadily since the 3rd quarter of 2017 (source: TradingEconomics);
  • Manufacturing all across the Euro area continues to slip and remains in non- expansionary territory – 47.7 in May, which represented the lowest reading since April 2013 (source: IHS Markit and TradingEconomics);
  • The Euro area Services index remains slightly expansionary (52.5 in May, down from 52.8 in April), but continues to decline (source: TradingEconomics);
  • Euro area unemployment is stable at 7.7%, and remains at its lowest level since 2008 (source: TradingEconomics);
  • Inflation is a non-issue in Europe (1.7% year-over-year in April), and the ECB has turned decidedly dovish again. Deflation represents the bigger risk at this point (source: TradingEconomics);
  • Japan’s GDP is back in positive territory (1.6% in Q4 2018 and 2.1% in Q1 2019), but remains sluggish and sensitive to changes in exchange rates. A strengthening dollar (should it continue) will help slightly with exports (source: TradingEconomics);
  • China’s (official) GDP growth in Q1 2019 was 6.4% (annualized), the same as Q4 2018, and represents the lowest reported growth rate since the Financial Crisis in 2008. That said, fairly massive fiscal and monetary stimulus has had the expected results in catalyzing improved economic activity (source: TradingEconomics);
  • The Chinese manufacturing index inched into expansionary territory (above 50) in March and April, but slid back to 49.2 in May (source: Deutsche Bank);
  • Should Chinese expansion continue (and we expect it will), it will be beneficial to the global economy, specifically Europe and other EM countries.

The Towerpoint Wealth Economic & Market Outlook:

  • The global economy continues to expand, though there is a deceleration of growth;
  • US economic growth, interest rates, inflation, and earnings all remain generally expansionary. Wages and input prices are slowly increasing, but we do not see them as threats (yet) to continued expansion;
  • Globally, inflation simply is not a problem, due to slow growth and relatively stable input prices. Oil prices rose steadily through mid-May, but have stabilized since then;
  • Global central bank policies remain “synchronized” around an easing theme, and this should be beneficial for risk assets;
  • Market volatility spiked in May as investors showed increased nervousness over trade tensions, Brexit, and the perception of slowing economic growth. There was a decided “flight to quality”, which drove US Treasuries to extremely low yields;
  • The May sell-off dropped US valuations, but they remain elevated by historical standards. Much of the market rally over the first four months of the year was driven by multiple expansions versus robust earnings growth, which was barely positive year-over-year in Q1;
  • The emerging markets were punished more severely than the US market in the May sell-off, but for longer-term investors we still like EM valuations relative to US valuations. Returns in US terms will be significantly impacted by what happens to the US dollar over the remainder of the year
  • The US yield curve remains incredibly flat (there currently is a ~14 bps difference between the 2- year and 10-year yields), as lower longer-term expected growth rates and investment flows combine with only modest inflation expectations to “tamp down” the long-end of the curve;
  • As of the end of May, following the announcement of the Mexican and European tariff threats from President Trump, the 10-year Treasury rate dropped below 2.20% – its lowest level since Q3 of 2017;
  • The yield curve has actually inverted if measured by the spread between 3-month rates and 10- year rates (though we prefer to follow the 2-year / 10-year spread). As of the end of May, there was a negative spread of roughly 10 basis points;
  • The public credit markets continue to look expensive to us, although investors seem to be fairly compensated for default risk, as corporate balance sheets generally are in pretty good shape;
  • Both investment grade and high yield credit spreads widened over the course of May, especially high yield spreads, but that was driven as much by the decline in Treasury rates as it was by an actual increase in credit spreads;
  • We remain concerned, however, about high yield liquidity and refinancing risk and the growing level of “covenant lite” bank loans. Additionally, roughly 40% of non- financial investment grade debt is rated BBB – the lowest investment grade level. If and when we head into the next recession, there could be a liquidity crisis if more than a modest amount of this debt falls into non-investment grade territory (source: FocusEconomics);
  • For investors who can access the private markets and handle some degree of illiquidity, we still believe there are better opportunities in the private versus public markets, though investors face compressed premiums versus historical levels, driven by huge investment flows over the past 24-30 months;
  • Hedge funds generally are performing as expected, and given valuations and renewed volatility in traditional equity and credit markets, there is growing investor interest in considering lower- correlated investment strategies;
  • Liquid alternatives (alternative investment strategies that trade in mutual fund form) continue to struggle, and have experienced fairly extensive investment outflows as a result. It is difficult to say with certainty that the issue is structural, though we do believe that hedge funds face less constraints with respect to leverage and liquidity – two important drivers of potential performance;
  • Real assets, after a nice rally through the end of April (especially oil), showed signs of stabilizing or even declining as we moved through May;
  • When we consider the fundamental drivers of market performance – economic growth, earning, interest rates, inflation, and central bank policy – we remain generally constructive, but we have entered a new phase of the market cycle, and we expect increased volatility and periodic bouts of investor panic as we move through the year, especially once the “summer doldrums” are over;
  • With that in mind, clients need to have their expectations managed as to what their portfolios can deliver over a full market cycle, and we believe a heightened focus on diversification is an appropriate course of action.

We closed our April Commentary as follows: “We are not losing any sleep just yet, but we think there may be some sleepless nights ahead. Pay attention, stay diversified, and keep your investment horizon aligned with your financial plan.”

In May, investors were re-introduced to market volatility – and perhaps some sleepless nights. And we think our advice is even more valid now than it was at the end of April – pay attention, stay diversified, and keep your investment horizon aligned with your financial plan.

Joseph F. Eschleman, CIMA®
Towerpoint Wealth, LLC

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

“The Great Interest Rate Debate”

Interest rates are headed back down, at least according to recent market consensus. Understanding the almost constant stream of news we hear about rates moving up or down, why should an ordinary investor care? Here’s why:

Many people believe that the stock market tends to do well when the U.S. Federal Reserve System, commonly known as “The Fed,” lowers interest rates. “We have now reared an entire generation of investors that buy stocks because interest rates go down,” said Brian Belski, chief investment strategist at BMO Capital Markets. The thinking: Easier monetary policy will help boost borrowing, pad corporate earnings, and possibly free up more cash for stock buybacks. However, history has repeatedly shown that it is best to turn a deaf ear to the Fed’s and to the market’s interest-rate chatter, and that rising rates have actually been good for stocks:

The central banking system of the United States was created primarily to alleviate financial crises; however, over the years, the roles and responsibilities of the Federal Reserve System have expanded. And while it is of great debate whether or not the Fed has too much control and power, what is certain is when the Chair of the Federal Reserve (currently Jerome Powell) speaks, investors and the markets pay attention.

There are current concerns that the growth of the U.S. economy is slowing, and with those concerns comes speculation that the Fed will reduce interest rates to stimulate the economy. However, at Towerpoint Wealth, we do not get too excited at the prospects of lower interest rates, and we do not become too worried at the prospects of higher rates, for reasons evidenced above. We follow a disciplined process and philosophy with our clients to help them build and protect their wealth, with shorter-term movements in the markets, in the economy, in politics, and in interest rates typically being of little concern. While we certainly pay attention and are attuned to what is happening, we rarely are reactionary.

TPW Celebrates Two Year Anniversary at Frank Fat’s
Locally, the Towerpoint Wealth family had an opportunity to let our hair down last week as we celebrated the firm’s two year anniversary, and enjoyed a fun long lunch at the iconic Frank Fat’s in downtown Sacramento. Fat’s was recently honored with a listing as a Bib Gourmand by Michelin Guide (customers must be able to order two courses and a glass of wine or dessert for $40 or less), and everyone agreed the meal did not disappoint!

There will always be a clear expectation for everyone to work their butts off at TPW, but there is also a clear expectation that we are a family, and will be having a lot of fun along the way!

Aside from downtown dining and interest rate scrutiny, a number of trending and notable events have occurred over the past two weeks:

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

  • An excellent article discussing whether or not a recession may be around the corner here in the United States
  • An article in the well-known wealth management industry periodical Financial Advisor IQ, featuring TPW’s President, Joseph Eschleman
  • Seek, an app that gives you detailed information on any plant or animal you take a photograph of by using image recognition technology

We encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.com) with any questions, concerns, or needs you have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place. We are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team

Towerpoint Wealth No Comments

‘Tarrified!’ – Trade War Hysterics

Right or wrong, good or bad, here are the two MAIN reasons we are in a trade war with China:

Here is what each country is importing from and exporting to each other:

And while we believe tariff increases will not help the U.S. economy in the shorter-term, we also believe it is not time to hit the panic button, as $250 billion of tariffs, spread over $14 trillion of consumer spending, is not necessarily recession-inducing. It certainly is true that some U.S. businesses, like soybean farmers, are hurt. However, after trade talks with China ended without agreement earlier this month, President Trump increased direct payments to farmers by $14.5 billion, plus another $1.6 billion in related aid.


Why are we pursuing this trade policy? Two primary reasons:

  1. China has stolen hundreds of billions of dollars of research and development (R&D) and intellectual property (IP) from companies that are at the leading edge of growth. This has been a glaring issue that the World Trade Organization (WTO) has failed to address for decades.
  2. As illustrated above, the large and growing trade deficit the United States has with China, partly due to the fact that China has higher tariffs on imports than the US does. The current U.S. administration believes that working to eliminate these lopsided tariffs is worthwhile.

Clearly free trade benefits all involved parties and economies. But leveling the playing field and fighting the massive theft of IP is extremely important for the longer-term health of our economy. Such violations — from counterfeiting famous brands and stealing trade secrets, to pressuring companies to share technology with local companies to gain access to China’s vast market — have long angered many of China’s overseas competitors. As a result, companies are wary of doing business there.


And right or wrong, good or bad, if tariffs nick our economy, China’s gets hammered.  Last year we exported $180 billion in goods and services to China, which is 0.9% of our GDP.  Meanwhile, China exported $559 billion to the U.S., which is 4.6% of their economy. We have enormous economic leverage that they simply cannot match. An extended U.S.-China trade battle means U.S. companies will shift supply chains out of China and toward places like Singapore, Vietnam, Mexico, or back home here in the USA. If that happens, the Chinese economy will be hurt for decades.

Quoting Don Rissmiller, chief economist at institutional research firm Strategas, “This is not the best time for a trade war. [However], it might be fair to say there is no good time for a trade war.” While we agree, and let’s hope President’s Trump and Xi do too, we feel it is important to simply understand the reasons why this is happening.

Eschleman and LaTurner in the Windy City


Shifting gears to somewhat closer to home, President, Joseph Eschleman and Partner – Wealth Advisor, Jonathan LaTurner, spent two full days in Chicago last week, keeping their professional saws sharp at a wealth management conference hosted by First Trust Advisors. Joseph and Jonathan enjoyed a thorough financial “deep-dive” at the conference, learning more about the current and future state of the U.S. and global economy and financial markets, in addition to presentations about practice management and also the current U.S. political landscape.


However, you can’t go to Chicago and have the trip be all work and no play! Joseph and Jonathan managed to fit in a Chicago Cubs game at Wrigley Field, and a business dinner at Gibsons Bar & Steakhouse as well!

In addition to trade wars and trips to the Windy City, there have been a number of trending and notable events that have occurred over the past two weeks:

Lastly, please take three or four minutes to review the curated content found below, highlighted by:

  • Special Market Update we just published today, “Trade Wars, Volatility, and Fear, Oh My!”
  • A well-written article that discusses the many considerations associated with California residency rules, from both a personal and an income tax standpoint
  • Calorie Mama, an app that gives you nutritional information on any food you take a picture of!

We encourage you to reach out to us (info@towerpointwealth.comwith any questions, concerns, or needs you have. The world continues to be an extremely complicated place. We are here for you, and look forward to connecting with, helping, and being a direct, fully independent, and objective expert financial resource for you.

Joseph, Jonathan, and the entire Towerpoint Wealth team